Oct 2 2012
A Lean Journey: Meet-up: Michel Baudin
See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing
Interview on Tim McMahon’s A Lean Journey.
See on www.aleanjourney.com
Oct 2 2012
See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing
Interview on Tim McMahon’s A Lean Journey.
See on www.aleanjourney.com
By Michel Baudin • Blog clippings • 0 • Tags: Cellular manufacturing, Continuous improvement, Data mining, industrial engineering, Kaizen, Kanban, Lean, Lean implementation, Lean Logistics, Lean manufacturing, Management, Manufacturing engineering, Quality, Toyota, Toyota Production System, TPS
Aug 5 2012
See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing
An approach to improving the experience of using a buffet that relies on capping the number of people with concurrent access. It is like the nightclub or museum management system in which a fixed number of visitors is allowed in, and the next one only allowed in when one leaves.
This is in the same spirit as the purely production control approach to Lean, in which you change production planning and scheduling but you don’t redesign the production line itself. For pointers on buffet design, see Waiting For Each Other.
See on www.software-kanban.de
By Michel Baudin • Press clippings • 0 • Tags: Buffer, Kanban, Lean, Restaurant
Aug 1 2012
See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing
“Hansgrohe uses RFID-enabled kanban (signal) cards to track the flow of containers between its two production sites. The company now enjoys several benefits, including accelerated goods receipt and the certainty of having all the required components readily available for assembly.”
See on bathroomdesignideas.freeenergygeneration.net
The system has been used since 2008, and Hansgrohe provided the following pictures:
The cards look like regular kanbans.
The cards are read when placed in the mailbox on the left.
The full mailbox is read at once.
It should be noted that this system does not eliminate the recirculating cards, but simply replace bar codes with RFID chips as a means of integrating the Kanban system with the company’s ERP system, for the advantages of richer and faster data collection. It does not eliminate the manual handling of cards, at least internally to the plant.
The next step would be to eliminate the cards, attach the RFID tags to part bins, install readers on racks, and implement the replenishment logic electronically. But the readers would have to be substantially smaller than those shown in the pictures.
By Michel Baudin • Blog clippings • 2 • Tags: Kanban, Lean, RFID
Feb 27 2012
Via Scoop.it – lean manufacturing
The floods in Thailand are the latest. Before, there was the Fukushima earthquake and, going back further in time, the Aisin Seiki fire of 1997 in Japan and the Mississippi flood of 1993… Each time, the press has faulted Lean for making the economic disruptions caused by theses events worse. The actual record is that the vigilance inherent in Lean Logistics and the strength of customer-supplier relationships in a Lean Supply Chain are in fact key to a rapid recovery.
In 1993, Toyota logisticians in Chicago reserved all the trucking available in the area a few days before the flood cut off the rail lines to California, thereby allowing the NUMMI plant to keep working during the flood.
In 1997, when the Aisin Seiki fire deprived Toyota in Japan of its single source of proportioning valves, other suppliers came to the rescue in what the Wall Street Journal a few months later called the business equivalent of an Amish barn raising.
You can, and should protect production against routine fluctuations. That is what tools like Kanbans are countermeasures for. But there is no way you can afford to protect your business against all possible, rare catastrophic events. What you can and must do instead is be vigilant and prepared to respond quickly and creatively to whatever nature or society might throw at you.
Via the Bangkok Post
By Michel Baudin • Press clippings • 2 • Tags: Kanban, Lean, Lean Logistics, Lean supply chain
Feb 18 2013
Supermarket sizing
Bosch’s Taojie Hua (涛杰 华) asked the following question:
The response covers the following topics:
Supermarkets in Lean
First we have to clarify what we mean by a supermarket in a Lean manufacturing context. As the term has become popular, some plants have started using it for their warehouses, which is clearly excessive. Often, it is used for any kind of buffer on the shop floor, provided it is used to implement pull. I prefer to reserve the term for buffers from which users withdraw items in smaller quantities than are brought in. If pallets come in and go out, I don’t call it a supermarket, but, if 27-bin pallets come in and withdrawals take place 1 bin at a time, I do.
On a shop floor, supermarkets are found on the edges of manufacturing islands containing a group of cells or a production line and contain either incoming or outgoing materials. A supermarket for incoming materials has more in common with the refrigerator in your kitchen than with the supermarket you buy groceries in. You need one when your plant Materials or Logistics organization is unable to deliver materials in a form that is suitable for direct use at a production work station.
The supermarket is owned by Production, and more specifically by the first-line manager in charge of the cells or lines it serves. It is replenished by Materials or Logistics through periodic milk runs, but parts are withdrawn by experienced members of the production team — cell leaders or water spiders — and move from the supermarket to production on hand carts, gravity flow racks, or by hand. The parts arrive in the supermarkets in bins that are too large for the line side, and leave in kit trays, small bins, or single units.
You need a supermarket for outgoing materials when your production runs are multiples of the quantities needed downstream. This happens, for example, if you only know how to paint parts in batches of 50 with the same color, while assembly alternates colors one unit at a time. In outgoing supermarkets, materials are replenished by Production and withdrawn by Materials/Logistics.
Supermarket capacity
For incoming supermarkets, replenishment by milk runs is essential because it makes lead times predictable. I am assuming here that the upstream supply chain does not cause shortages. Making it work is no small feat, but this question is specifically on supermarkets. On the withdrawal side, you want to have the smoothest possible consumption rate for all items, so that you don’t have large ups and downs to contend with, which you achieve with heijunka (平準化) sequencing of production. Little’s Law then tell you that you have, for means:
If you take the minimum quantity that Materials can deliver to the supermarket, on the average the Quantity on hand will be half of it. You know the Consumption Rate. The Replenishment lead time is a multiple of the milk run pitch, plus the time needed for Materials to act on the pull signal, which depends on when the need is identified and how the signal is passed to Materials.
Assume you consume 1 unit every 25 seconds, the milk run pitch is 30 minutes, and Materials delivers in bins of 100 units. You consume 72 parts/pitch = 0.72 bins/pitch. If the milk runs are used to convey pull signals, as happens with the two-bin system or with hardcopy kanbans, replenishment may take up to 2 pitches. In this example, the 2-bin system would cause shortages, but a Kanban loop with two cards wouldn’t, because you pull the card when you withdraw the first unit from the bin and it is still 99% full. If, instead of using cards, you issue an electronic signal when you withdraw the first unit, Materials can act on it in the next milk run, meaning at most 1 pitch later. You still need room for two bins, because the current bin will still hold at least 28 parts when the replacement bin arrives.
In this example, the mismatch between the size of the delivered bins and the consumption rate forces you to hold enough excess material that you don’t need to worry about safety stocks. If it were instead perfectly matched, you could receive a bin of 72 parts like clockwork every 30 minutes, except that fluctuations in consumption occasionally would cause shortages, and you would need some safety stock to protect yourself against it. Coming up with a sensible plan for any one item in your supermarket is not a major task, but you need such a plan for every item.
The speed with which signals circulate adjusts itself with fluctuations in consumption. The real question is whether your “customer withdrawing less than planned” should be treated as a fluctuation or a permanent drop. In the first case, there is no action required; in the second, you need to recalculate. In any case, you need to periodically validate the parameters of your pull system to make sure they still reflect reality. In auto parts, it should be done at least quarterly.
Further reading
For details on pull systems, see Lean Logistics, Part IV, pp. 197-330. See also the two posts on Safety Stocks: Beware of Formulas and Safety Stocks: More about the formula.
Share this:
Like this:
By Michel Baudin • Answers to reader questions • 0 • Tags: Heijunka, Kanban, Lean, Milk run, Safety Stock, Supermarket