Michel Baudin's Blog
Ideas from manufacturing operations
  • Home
  • Home
  • About the author
  • Ask a question
  • Consulting
  • Courses
  • Leanix™ games
  • Sponsors
  • Meetup group

Dec 20 2012

Manufacturing Hall of Fame: Meet the Class of 2012 | IW Manufacturing Hall of Fame content from IndustryWeek

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

Now in its fourth year, the IW Manufacturing Hall of Fame gives us an opportunity to reflect on what — and who — is most important to the world of manufacturing.

Michel Baudin‘s insight:

I already posted the citation on Robert W. Hall. This is about the complete list of inductees.

See on www.industryweek.com

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Press clippings 0 • Tags: Awards, Lean, Lean manufacturing, Manufacturing

Dec 20 2012

Karen Wilhelm’s Lean Reflections

This is the third of three contributions to John Hunter‘s Annual Management Blog Review.

It is about Karen Wilhelm’s Lean Reflections, which needs to be said because there is another blog by the same name. Karen’s blog is at leanreflect.com; the other one, at leanreflections.com.

On the front page, Karen promotes herself as follows: “Need impeccable, clear, fact-checked web or print content that gets lean concepts right? Talk to me.” I got to know Karen more than 15 years ago, when she was the editor of the SME’s Lean Directions newsletter, and I have to agree that every claim she makes is true. When I wrote articles for her newsletter, she helped me improve them, and I have been regularly reading hers, with the confidence that I would learn something, that the information would be accurate, and that it would be clear and easy to follow.

Karen Wilhelm differs from the other Lean bloggers in that she is a professional writer and editor who knows about Lean, rather than a Lean professional who writes. She is not selling anything other than her ability to report on what others are doing, and she does not make recommendations or put forward opinions. So you read her for the  facts, not for guidance on what to think. And her blog is easy to search.

Clocking in at about 2 posts/month, Karen is not the most prolific blogger, but her output has been steady since 2005. While the last two posts, about a squirrel in her attic and the tracing of her iPad mini’s world travels may make you think “slow news day,” you find plenty of red meat in her archives, often about topics that are not well documented elsewhere, like Toyota’s shop floor safety policies and practices, or the meaning of Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Blog reviews 0 • Tags: Lean

Dec 18 2012

Gemba Panta Rei

This is the second of three contributions to John Hunter‘s Annual Management Blog Review.

You just heard a consultant use a Japanese term you are not familiar with, say “Kamishibai” or “Yokoten,” and you google it in search of its meaning. More often than not, the clearest, most detailed explanation comes up in the form of a post in Jon Miller’s Gemba Panta Rei blog. I have been a fan of his writings ever since I noticed this. Jon was born and raised in Japan, and attended Japanese schools as a child; as a result, he is fully bicultural with the US, which gives him a unique perspective on Lean and the Toyota Production System.

Advertised on the home page is Jon’s remarkable translation of Taiichi Ohno’s Workplace Management. As Jon explains in his introduction, “Our philosophy was to translate both Ohno’s meaning and style, and sacrifice neither of these to polish the English expression. […] In the process of translation and editing, our goal was to cut out nothing, and add as little as possible in order to maintain the flow of Ohno’s speech and thought.” I agree, and tried to work the same way when translating Pascal Dennis’s Getting the Right Things Done into French. Ohno’s language is vivid and laced with untranslatable puns. Rather than omitting the plays on words or looking for some, inevitably lame, English-language equivalent, Jon quotes the original and explains it in a footnote. The improved accuracy is well worth the breaks in the flow that this causes.

Oddly, the best information in Gamba Panta Rei is easier to find through Google than on the blog’s home page, where I couldn’t find a search box. After pulling down the Archives menu, I still couldn’t tell where I would find the posts about Kamishibai or Yokoten. Also, while the blog still has recent articles with substantive discussions of topics that Jon finds challenging or interesting, they are now commingled with a good 50% of material that is direct, commercial promotion of the Kaizen Institute, the company that acquired Jon’s original Gemba Research, and of which he is now the CEO. So, if you want Jon’s insights but not a sales pitch, google the topic.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Blog reviews 2 • Tags: Gemba, Lean

Dec 17 2012

The Lean Edge

John Hunter asked me to participate this year in his Annual Management Blog Review, and I agreed to review three blogs I follow, starting with The Lean Edge.  It is a blog with multiple authors, including some of the best writers about Lean. I enjoy reading posts from people like Art Smalley, Jeffrey Liker, or Pascal Dennis, to name a few, but I find the site busy and confusing.

On top of the home page is the question of the month: “Why has the Lean movement largely failed to capture the imagination of the sales team?” by Joel Stanwood, and it is followed by 10 answers that are on-topic. But then the next post is a repeat of the question and it is followed by posts that are unrelated to it, such as “Establish a daily pattern production schedule to sequence your presses,” by Peter Handlinger.

To understand the logic behind this, you tab over to the “About” page, according to which “The Lean EDGE is a platform for discussion between management thinkers and lean management writers. Lean authors give their responses to general management questions posed by guest writers. The aim of the discussion is to share different points of view and to collectively build a vision of lean management.”

San Francisco parking signIt is simple as a San Francisco parking sign (see left). It introduces four categories of participants: management thinkers, lean management writers, lean authors, and guest writers. When you go back to the Home page to see who is in these different categories, you find everybody lumped in a list called “Authors” on the left sidebar, alphabetized by first names, and including people who are business executives and not writers. You even find two entries that are not people at all, like “book announcement” and “event announcement.”

I did participate as an author for a while, but resigned in frustration. You are prompted to “Write a comment” on any post but you are not supposed to. If you want to write a comment, you have to submit as a new post, which goes against your conditioned reflex as a blog reader. And then you are supposed to respond only to the original question, not to another contributor’s post. So you put all these great authors together to “share different points of view,” but they may not debate each other.  It was like visiting Switzerland, where I always feel that everybody is watching me for breaking some rule I don’t know but everybody else does.

I think the root of the problem is that The Lean Edge is trying to do with WordPress something that it isn’t intended or well-suited for. To me, a blog is a conversation between one author and the world, and the ones I enjoy most have an unfettered, unique authorial voice. With multiple authors, it is not a blog but a forum. It works by different rules and needs different software platforms, such as LinkedIn Groups.

Still, I occasionally visit The Lean Edge because I am interested in what Peter Handlinger has to say about scheduling a press shop, or Orry Fiume about making field sales reps participate in Kaizen events.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Blog reviews 3 • Tags: Lean, Lean authors, LinkedIn, WordPress

Dec 17 2012

Manufacturing Hall of Fame 2012 Inductee: Robert ‘Doc’ Hall | IW … – IndustryWeek

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

IndustryWeekManufacturing Hall of Fame 2012 Inductee: Robert ‘Doc’ Hall | IW …IndustryWeekFor more than 30 years, Hall has been both a student and strong advocate of Japanese production methods and lean manufacturing techniques.

Michel Baudin‘s insight:

I still have his 1983 book on my shelf, and it is still useful.

See on www.industryweek.com

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Press clippings 1 • Tags: Lean, Robert W. Hall

Howie Makem

Dec 16 2012

Deming’s Point 10 of 14 – Eliminate slogans and exhortations

Deming’s full statement is as follows:

Eliminate slogans, exhortations, and targets for the work force asking for zero defects and new levels of productivity. Such exhortations only create adversarial relationships, as the bulk of the causes of low quality and low productivity belong to the system and thus lie beyond the power of the work force.

Ben Hamper’s Rivethead

This point reminds me of Howie Makem, the quality cat lampooned by Ben Hamper in Rivethead in 1986, about the same time Deming’s Out of the Crisis was published. At the time, Ben Hamper was a riveter at GM’s Truck plant in Flint, MI, who could describe his shop floor experience with the wit of a Tom Wolfe. Rivethead was originally a column in Michael Moore’s Flint Voice, later edited into a book.

According to Hamper, the management of the plant had decided that what it needed to improve quality was a mascot for workers to rally around, and organized a naming contest, of which “Howie Makem” was the winning entry. The mascot then materialized as a man in a cat suit with a large Q embroidered on a red cape walking the floor and exhorting operators to improve quality amid jeers, catcalls and the occasional bolt throw. Howie Makem is one of the few artifacts of which no picture can be found on Google, which is why I had to draw it from Hamper’s description.

Spending time and money on slogans, mascots, banners and monogrammed shirts or mugs is predicated on the assumptions (1) that quality and productivity problems are primarily due to lack of motivation in shop floor operators and (2) that it can be changed by the same kind of marketing campaign that works for selling detergents. Deming’s and Hamper’s point is that it is counterproductive and that these assumptions are false.

The key points that I see about appropriate public relations and communications around Lean are as follows:

  • Do it first, play it back later
  • Car companies and public relations on manufacturing
  • Promotion of Lean efforts by component suppliers

Do it first, play it back later

Improvement does need marketing and promotion inside the company, to customers, and to suppliers, but not at the start of the effort, and not in this form.

The beginning of an improvement program like Lean transformation is when it is most likely to fail. At that time, the organization, from management to line workers, has everything to learn about its technical and managerial content, as well as the art of implementing it. It is then that they will make the most mistakes and therefore least need publicity. The first pilot projects only need to be known and understood by those who are directly involved, and should not be announced upfront with a marching band at an all-hands meeting. You are much better off trumpeting results once the projects are successes that can inspire others. And even then, it is not done with slogans but by testimonials of participants, demonstrating the improvements directly on the floor or in video recordings.

With outsiders as well, you do it first and play it back later. You don’t announce what you are going to do, but, once it is done, you make it a field trip destination for local schoolchildren as well as other industrial tourists.

Car companies and public relations on manufacturing

Toyota plants have visitor centers with posters on the products and cartoons explaining the production system to children and have a whole staff of professional tour guides taking groups on a set path through the plant, wearing headsets to hear the explanations. These tours are part of public relations and not given by retirees, as is the case at many other companies.

Porsches-Leipzig-plant
Porsche Leipzig

Porsche in Leipzig charges customers €1,000 extra to spend a day at the plant to pick up their Panameras or Cayennes, during which they get a tour of the shop floor featuring their version of Lean, a lunch at top of the visitor center, and an hour with a driving pro on the test track to learn how best to drive their new car in various conditions.A striking feature of this plant site, is that it is dominated by the round, inverted diamond shape of the visitor center, on the top left of the photogaph, between the test track on the left and the production shops on the right.

g.-volkswagen-transparent-assembly-plant-in-dresden
VW transparent assembly plant in Dresden

This is part of a new marketing trend in Germany, where, rather than hide plants away, you locate the cleanest, most automated and most spectacular processes where your customers, or even the public at large, can see them. In this spirit, Volkswagen has located a plant downtown Dresden, with glass walls for passersby to see the final assembly of cars.

Motorcycle homecoming at Honda in Marysville in 2005
Motorcycle homecoming, Honda Marysville, 2005

Honda pioneered a different form of promotion of its manufacturing system to end users with its homecomings at the Honda motorcycle plant in Marysville, OH, where, once a year, they hosted bikers who see the production lines and meet the operators who built their bikes. The same approach was later emulated by the now defunct Saturn division of GM.

Companies in other industries rarely go this far, particularly when their products do not excite the public’s imagination. Bart Simpson’s class goes on a field trip to a box factory, which does not generate much enthusiasm.

Promotion of Lean efforts by component suppliers

If you make components to sell to OEMs rather than to consumers, the promotion of your Lean programs takes a different form, with customers sending teams of auditors to assess whether you are “Lean enough” to do business with, and they may send you supplier support engineers to help you implement Lean to their satisfaction. This means that you must present your plant in a way that allows the auditors to check all the marks needed to give you the right score, even if it means setting up a Potemkin village with tools that you don’t think are essential to your business.

Working with your customers’ supplier support organization — or supporting your own suppliers — is a different process, requiring a deeper level of involvement, and it is not a matter of public relations for either side, and should not be treated as one. The customer provides free consulting to help the supplier increase productivity and improve quality. In exchange, the supplier reduces prices by a fixed ratio every year, calculated so that the improvements are to economic benefit of both sides. The customer pays less, while the supplier makes more profits. It is a win-win, but not an easy system to set up and operate. It involves top management, engineering on both sides, purchasing on the customer side, and customer service on the supplier side, and it is not run by Public Relations.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Asenta selection, Deming 9 • Tags: Deming, Lean certification, Marketing communications, PR, Public Relations, supplier development

«‹ 110 111 112 113›»

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 578 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • From MBO to Hoshin Kanri
  • My Toyota Forklift
  • Label your charts!
  • Quality and Me (Part I) — Semiconductors
  • Update on Data Science versus Statistics

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Answers to reader questions
  • Asenta selection
  • Automation
  • Blog clippings
  • Blog reviews
  • Book reviews
  • Case studies
  • Data science
  • Deming
  • Events
  • History
  • Information Technology
  • Laws of nature
  • Management
  • Metrics
  • News
  • Organization structure
  • Personal communications
  • Policies
  • Polls
  • Press clippings
  • Quality
  • Technology
  • Tools
  • Training
  • Uncategorized
  • Van of Nerds
  • Web scrapings

Social links

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

My tags

5S Automation Autonomation Cellular manufacturing Continuous improvement data science Deming ERP Ford Government Health care industrial engineering Industry 4.0 Information technology IT jidoka Kaizen Kanban Lean Lean assembly Lean Health Care Lean implementation Lean Logistics Lean management Lean manufacturing Logistics Management Manufacturing Manufacturing engineering Metrics Mistake-Proofing Poka-Yoke Quality Six Sigma SMED SPC Standard Work Strategy Supply Chain Management Takt time Toyota Toyota Production System TPS Training VSM

↑

© Michel Baudin's Blog 2025
Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes
%d