Michel Baudin's Blog
Ideas from manufacturing operations
  • Home
  • Home
  • About the author
  • Ask a question
  • Consulting
  • Courses
  • Leanix™ games
  • Sponsors
  • Meetup group

Feb 20 2013

Should an auto parts plant use “smart” part numbers?

Mumin Vatansever, from TKG Otomotiv in Turkey, asked the following question:

I am a newly graduated production control engineer in an auto factory.
We are trying to organize our system according to the SAP.  We really do not know whether we should use smart numbers or not.  We do not know what the advantages and disadvantages of using them ? Also if it is possible could you please give me a smart code example ?

55774 05020 is a part number we have, and its process steps are as follows:

  1. Scissor
  2. Press machine
  3. Weld
  4. Packing
  5. Delivery

Technically, there is no doubt that “smart” part numbers should be replaced with keys and property lists.

I am not expert in SAP, but I don’t believe it restricts you in these matters. Manufacting Part Numbers (MPN) should be unique and short, with all information stored in other fields, either standard in SAP or user-defined. Being unique is a part number’s main job, for obvious reasons. Being short matters if they ever have to read by humans. Sequences of 5 uppercase letters and numbers give you 60 million possible unique IDs, which is probably enough for your needs. Avoid case-sensitive IDs, because people will confuse items 78De5 and 78DE5. 

What worries me is your statement that you are a “newly graduated production control engineer.” I don’t want my advice to get you in trouble. If your bosses are like 99% of the manufacturing professionals I know, they have been trained to believe in “smart” part numbers and are uncomfortable with the thought that they are an obsolete legacy of the pencil-and-paper age. You may have to go along and implement one anyway.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Answers to reader questions 0 • Tags: nomenclature, part numbering systems, smart part numbers

Feb 19 2013

Oppama Style | Dumontis

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

A look at production behind the scenes at Nissan’s Oppama Plant, where everyday the Nissan Juke, Cube, Sylphy and 100%-electric LEAF roll off the lines

Michel Baudin‘s insight:

I did visit the Oppama plant(追浜工場), in 1980. Then it was making the Nissan Leopard for the Japanese market, the company’s cars were sold in the US under the Datsun brand, and they used Kanbans, which they called “workplates” to avoid borrowing the vocabulary of archrival “Company T from Aichi Prefecture.”

Times have changed. No one then could imagine that Nissan would ever fall under the control of a “second-rate” company like Renault, and even less that this odd couple would actually work while other seemingly better matches — like DaimlerBenz with Chrysler — would fail. And the Oppama plant soldiers on.

In this three-minute video of an 8-hour process, you catch glimpses of stamping, welding, painting, and assembly. The first thing that struck me was to see the superintendent, who was guiding the video tour, wearing a suit and tie. Perhaps it was for the camera but, in other Japanese plants I have been in, it would have been a faux-pas, as executives make a point of not standing out from shop floor operators by what they wear.

The little we see of the operations is as expected, frome the body welding robots  to the “pirate-ship” carts of parts that move along with the line in final assembly and the different types of engines lifted into the car bodies.

The plant has a densely-packed, lived-in look. It has been around for a while, and looks like a place where people make cars. By contrast, some of the newer plants in Germany like Porsche in Leipzig or Volkswagen in Dresden, look like showrooms.

And a hat tip to Dumontis for calling it Oppama Style.

See on www.youtube.com

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Blog clippings 0 • Tags: Lean, Nissan, Nissan Production Way, Plant tours, Plant video

Feb 18 2013

Supermarket sizing

Bosch’s Taojie Hua (涛杰 华) asked the following question:

How do you define a maximum limit for a supermarket?
Especially when the customer withdraws less than planned, and the lot can not be formed as a production signal, how can I react to that “deviation” by setting a proper max limit?

The response covers the following topics:

  • Supermarkets in Lean
  • Supermarket capacity
  • Further reading

Supermarkets in Lean

First we have to clarify what we mean by a supermarket in a Lean manufacturing context. As the term has become popular, some plants have started using it for their warehouses, which is clearly excessive. Often, it is used for any kind of buffer on the shop floor, provided it is used to implement pull. I prefer to reserve the term for buffers from which users withdraw items in smaller quantities than are brought in. If pallets come in and go out, I don’t call it a supermarket, but, if 27-bin pallets come in and withdrawals take place 1 bin at a time, I do.

On a shop floor, supermarkets are found on the edges of manufacturing islands containing a group of cells or a production line and contain either incoming or outgoing materials.  A supermarket for incoming materials has more in common with the refrigerator in your kitchen than with the supermarket you buy groceries in. You need one when your plant Materials or Logistics organization is unable to deliver materials in a form that is suitable for direct use at a production work station.

Water spider at Solectron in Mexico (2005)
Water spider at Solectron in Mexico (2005)

The supermarket is owned by Production, and more specifically by the first-line manager in charge of the cells or lines it serves. It is replenished  by  Materials or Logistics through periodic milk runs, but parts are withdrawn by experienced members of the production team — cell leaders or water spiders — and move from the supermarket to production on hand carts, gravity flow racks, or by hand. The parts arrive in the supermarkets in bins that are too large for the line side, and leave in kit trays, small bins, or single units.

You need a supermarket for outgoing materials when your production runs are multiples of the quantities needed downstream. This happens, for example, if you only know how to paint parts in batches of 50 with the same color, while assembly alternates colors one unit at a time. In outgoing supermarkets, materials are replenished by Production and withdrawn by Materials/Logistics.

Supermarket capacity

For incoming supermarkets, replenishment by milk runs is essential because it makes lead times predictable. I am assuming here that the upstream supply chain does not cause shortages. Making it work is no small feat, but this question is specifically on supermarkets. On the withdrawal side, you want to have the smoothest possible consumption rate for all items, so that you don’t have large ups and downs to contend with, which you achieve with  heijunka (平準化)  sequencing of production. Little’s Law then tell you that you have, for means:

\overline{Quantity\, on\, hand}\left ( Item \right )= \overline{Consumption\, rate}\left ( Item \right )\times \overline{Replenishment\, lead\, time}\left ( Item \right )

If you take the minimum quantity that Materials can deliver to the supermarket, on the average the Quantity on hand will be half of it. You know the Consumption Rate.  The Replenishment lead time is a multiple of the milk run pitch, plus the time needed for Materials to act on the pull signal, which depends on when the need is identified and how the signal is passed to Materials.

Assume you consume 1 unit every 25 seconds, the milk run pitch is 30 minutes, and Materials delivers in bins of 100 units. You consume 72 parts/pitch = 0.72 bins/pitch. If the milk runs are used to convey pull signals, as happens with the two-bin system or with hardcopy kanbans, replenishment may take up to 2 pitches. In this example, the 2-bin system would cause shortages, but a Kanban loop with two cards wouldn’t, because you pull the card when you withdraw the first unit from the bin and it is still 99% full. If, instead of using cards, you issue an electronic signal when you withdraw the first unit, Materials can act on it in the next milk run, meaning at most 1 pitch later. You still need room for two bins, because the current bin will still hold at least 28 parts when the replacement bin arrives.

In this example, the mismatch between the size of the delivered bins and the consumption rate forces you to hold enough excess material that you don’t need to worry about safety stocks. If it were instead perfectly matched, you could receive a bin of 72 parts like clockwork every 30 minutes, except that fluctuations in consumption occasionally would cause shortages, and you would need some safety stock to protect yourself against it.  Coming up with a sensible plan for any one item in your supermarket is not a major task, but you need such a plan for every item.

The speed with which signals circulate adjusts itself with fluctuations in consumption. The real question is whether your “customer withdrawing less than planned” should be treated as a fluctuation or a permanent drop. In the first case, there is no action required; in the second, you need to recalculate.  In any case, you need to periodically validate the parameters of your pull system to make sure they still reflect reality. In auto parts, it should be done at least quarterly.

Further reading

For details on pull systems, see Lean Logistics, Part IV, pp. 197-330. See also the two posts on Safety Stocks: Beware of Formulas and Safety Stocks: More about the formula.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Answers to reader questions 0 • Tags: Heijunka, Kanban, Lean, Milk run, Safety Stock, Supermarket

Feb 16 2013

Please Don’t Steal THIS Idea – Paying a % Bonus for Cost Savings | Mark Graban

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

“In the Kaizen approach, stealing the ideas of others isn’t a negative thing. If somebody else implemented an idea and you can use that idea in your area, a Kaizen organization ENCOURAGES the borrowing, stealing, adoption, and adaptation of ideas. There’s no shame in that. This idea was being preached at one hospital I visited yesterday, which was nice to see.

But… USA Today had a blurb the other day about one idea you shouldn’t steal. It’s an idea that’s already proven not to work – paying bonuses based on the value of improvement ideas.”

Michel Baudin‘s insight:

Mark exposes a “common sense” payment scheme that in fact discourages teamwork and turns employees into bounty hunters who withhold information from each other.

See on www.leanblog.org

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Blog clippings 0 • Tags: Kaizen, Lean, Lean management, Suggestion Systems

Feb 15 2013

Japan can still teach the world about management: Toshiyuki Shiga, Nissan – Economic Times

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

One might expect the Chief Operating Officer (COO) of a leading Japanese automobile company to be a man from manufacturing, an engineer who talks kanban and just-in-time processes. Not soToshiyuki Shiga, COO of Nissan. Shiga is a marketing man, an economics graduate fromOsaka Prefecture University and he’s more at home talking sociology than technology. Shiga has been with Nissan Motor Co for 37 years and he’s currently the second-in-command, after CEO Carlos Ghosn.

Michel Baudin‘s insight:

As a source of ideas in management and technology, Japan should neither be ignored, as it was through the 1970s, nor idealized as it was in the 1980s. It is 130 million fallible humans struggling with the hands they are dealt, who occasionally come up with insights we can all benefit from. This ia what I read in Shiga’s words.

See on economictimes.indiatimes.com

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Press clippings 0 • Tags: Japan, Management, Nissan

Feb 13 2013

Decoding Jeff Immelt and GE’s New Act: U.S. Manufacturer – Forbes

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

“Decoding Jeff Immelt and GE’s New Act: US Manufacturer: Can GE reinvent itself as a Agile manufacturer with a radical capacity to innovate? Is manufacturing back? At the very least, manufacturing is back in fashion, judging from the high profile conference last Thursday at the Newseum in downtown Washington DC. Amid panoramic views of the historic monuments and buildings of the Capitol, a bevy of high profile speakers, including Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer, Chairman and CEO of General Electric [GE] Jeff Immelt,…”

Michel Baudin‘s insight:

A sarcastic, iconoclastic take on GE’s top management and its strategy, particularly on Manufacturing and Lean, and a spirited debate in the comments that follow. And not a word about Six Sigma.

See on www.forbes.com

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Press clippings 0 • Tags: GE, Lean, Lean manufacturing, Outourcing

«‹ 106 107 108 109›»

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 575 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • The Language of Money for Engineers and Managers
  • Three San Francisco Bay Area Writers Have Coffee
  • Gemini Deep Research About Michel Baudin
  • The Lowdown on the Range Chart
  • From MBO to Hoshin Kanri

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Answers to reader questions
  • Asenta selection
  • Automation
  • Blog clippings
  • Blog reviews
  • Book reviews
  • Case studies
  • Data science
  • Deming
  • Events
  • History
  • Information Technology
  • Laws of nature
  • Management
  • Metrics
  • News
  • Organization structure
  • Personal communications
  • Policies
  • Polls
  • Press clippings
  • Quality
  • Technology
  • Tools
  • Training
  • Uncategorized
  • Van of Nerds
  • Web scrapings

Social links

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

My tags

5S Automation Autonomation Cellular manufacturing Continuous improvement data science Deming ERP Ford Government Health care industrial engineering Industry 4.0 Information technology IT jidoka Kaizen Kanban Lean Lean assembly Lean Health Care Lean implementation Lean Logistics Lean management Lean manufacturing Logistics Management Manufacturing Manufacturing engineering Metrics Mistake-Proofing Poka-Yoke Quality Six Sigma SMED SPC Standard Work Strategy Supply Chain Management Takt time Toyota Toyota Production System TPS Training VSM

↑

© Michel Baudin's Blog 2026
Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes
%d