Michel Baudin's Blog
Ideas from manufacturing operations
  • Home
  • Home
  • About the author
  • Ask a question
  • Consulting
  • Courses
  • Leanix™ games
  • Sponsors
  • Meetup group

Aug 1 2013

How to avoid human mistakes in production? The Lean approach | Renaud Anjoran

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing
Human operators make mistakes. But there are solutions: adopting the right philosophy, mistake-proofing each process, and self-inspection. (How to avoid human mistakes in production? The lean approach.

 

Michel Baudin‘s insight:

Renaud Anjoran shares his experience of mistake-proofing in Chinese factories, and quotes “Lean Assembly.” Thanks.

See on www.qualityinspection.org

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Blog clippings 1 • Tags: China, Lean, Mistake-Proofing, Poka-Yoke

Jul 29 2013

How the Tesla Model S is Made | The Window | Wired

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

If founder Elon Musk is right, Tesla Motors just might reinvent the American auto industry—with specialized robots building slick electric cars in a factory …

Michel Baudin‘s insight:

Tesla just released this promotional video showing glimpses of its factory, the former NUMMI plant in Fremont, CA. Tesla is partialy owned by Toyota.

See on www.youtube.com

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Web scrapings 1 • Tags: Elon Musk, NUMMI, Tesla, Toyota

Jul 26 2013

Australia’s Lean Trojan | Troy Taylor

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

Not all RTO’s are doing a great job, read this post and find out why your selection will make all the difference.

 

Michel Baudin‘s insight:

An Australian version of Certification-Shmertification!

See on www.businessleaners.com

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Blog clippings 0 • Tags: Australia, Lean, Lean certification

Jul 23 2013

Standard Work in Low-Volume/High-Mix Manufacturing

In the TPS Principles and Practices discussion group on LinkedIn, Brian Miller initiated a discussion on “How do you create standard work for a customized product that has over a billion combinations?” It has had 31 comments so far, and I would like to share here a few that I made.

Even in a plant that is perceived to be focused on low-volume/high-mix production, you usually have an uneven demand pattern, calling for different approaches to standard work by product category.

You start with a Runner/Repeater/Stranger analysis to determine what it is we do often and what not. Without this analysis, we commingle in the same lines products made every day with other products made sporadically (See Lean Assembly). In Japan, this is called P-Q, or Product-Quantity analysis, with the categories called A, B and C. The more vivid Runner/Repeater/Stranger terminology comes from Lucas Industries in the UK. You then use a dedicated, integrated production line for each Runners, a flexible line for each family of Repeaters, and a job-shop with functional groupings of equipment for Strangers.

Then, obviously, you face different challenges for developing standard work in each category:

  1. In a runner line, you can post A3 sheets above each workstations with instructions for the purpose of allowing supervisors to monitor how the work is being done. This is the normal situation of high-volume production.The operators themselves do not need to read the instructions for every workpiece; as soon as they are proficient in the job, they work from memory.Operator instructions in auto parts assembly
  2. A repeater line is for a family of products with variants but with a high commonality of materials and processes. The instructions that can be posted on A3 sheets are then limited to the common processes, but the operator needs to read what is specific to each workpiece. For final assembly of cars, Toyota has provided “build manifests” printed on larger sheets mounted on car bodies and bearing all the option information. The kitting of workpiece-specific components also helps. In computer assembly, workpiece specifics are shown on electronic displays, with component picks validated by auto-ID technology, including bar codes, QR-codes, or RFID chips.Toyota build manifest Valenciennes cropped

    Kit-trays-with-instructions-web
    Kit trays with instructions for repeaters in electronics assembly
  3. Strangers are the odds and ends with sporadic demand, one-of-a-kind systems, or new product prototypes. For strangers, you cannot rely on operator memory or habit. For one-of-a-kind systems or prototypes, you cannot even assume you have the knowledge needed to produce workable detailed instructions. Each stranger is a job in a job shop and requires instructions on a traveller that moves with the workpiece. The traveller may be hardcopy or electronic. An electronic traveller may either be a device containing all the instructions or an ID that triggers the download of appropriate instructions at each station. Strangers are usually built by skilled craftsmen able to work directly from engineering drawings. Given the nature of strangers, however, the time required cannot be precisely known and sequencing mistakes will happen, making rework inevitable.
Stranger assembly in Yatai at Omron
Stranger assembly in Yatai at Omron

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Technology 10 • Tags: Low-Volume/High-Mix, Runner-Repeater-Stranger, Standard Work, Work instructions, Yatai

Jul 18 2013

The Meaning of “Total” in Japanese Improvement Programs

As Armand Feigenbaum originally formulated Total Quality Control (TQC) in 1951, it meant quality control from product design to after-sales service. It had to do with the scope of the activity, not with who participates. In 1984, when Kaoru Ishikawa described the Japanese version of TQC, “Total” had come to mean “company-wide” (全社的,  zenshateki). Sometimes, it is even explicitly stated to mean “with participation by everyone” (全員参加, zenyinsanka).

It can be argued that the Japanese side mistranslated “Total,” but it makes no difference. If we want to understand TQC or TPM, we need to go by what they mean by it and realize its implications. “Participation by everyone,” in particular, means the following:

  1. The CEO and the janitor both participate. Personal involvement by top management is essential because it prevents anybody else claiming they are too busy.
  2. Training in the activity must cascade down from top management through all the layers in all the departments.
  3. There must be sanctions for refusal to participate.

As a consequence, the “Total” programs are difficult and expensive to implement. Before starting one, you must be sure that:

  1. It is worth it.
  2. The workforce has the needed skills.
  3.  Management relations are conducive to success.

Otherwise, it most often fizzles out after a flurry of initial activity. In the worst case, it leads to a mutiny. When starting improvement in a manufacturing plant, the prerequisites for any kind of “Total” program are rarely met. It is safer to start a with activities involving local, small teams of volunteers, whose success motivates others to join in. This gradually strengthens the organization to the point where it is able to pull through a program that requires participation by everyone.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Management 1 • Tags: Lean implementation, TPM, TQC

Jul 15 2013

Life after NUMMI and Solyndra for Fremont, CA | Manufacturers’ Monthly

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing
“How Fremont is turning itself into a magnet for manufacturers Manufacturers’ Monthly “The Warm Springs District has a centralised location, vast and unoccupied land, accessibility to BART [Bay Area Rapid Transit system] and a world-class…”

 

Michel Baudin‘s insight:

While Fremont, CA, is not well known outside the San Francisco Bay Area, it has a place in history as the site of the first auto plant in the US to fully apply the Toyota Production System, 5 years before it was called “Lean.” It was the NUMMI jjoint venture between GM and Toyota. It resurrected a shuttered GM plant in 1984, rehiring 2,500 of its former workers, and successfully built cars for both owners for 26 years until the GM bankruptcy forced its closure in 2010, causing the direct loss of nearly 5,000 jobs, not including the losses in the network of suppliers that had grown around the plant. Solar cell panel maker Solyndra was then a short-lived hope for revival in Fremont, until it went bankrupt in 2011.

Tesla now produces cars in part of the old NUMMI plant, giving it a 3rd lease on life, and disk-drive maker Seagate is moving into the old Solyndra facility. According to this article, Fremont is now marketing itself as a hub for high-technology manufacturing.

I live across the Bay from Fremont, and root for its success.

See on www.manmonthly.com.au

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Press clippings 0 • Tags: Fremont, Lean, NUMMI, Solyndra, Toyota, TPS

«‹ 88 89 90 91›»

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 578 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • My Toyota Forklift
  • Label your charts!
  • Quality and Me (Part I) — Semiconductors
  • Update on Data Science versus Statistics
  • How One-Piece Flow Improves Quality

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Answers to reader questions
  • Asenta selection
  • Automation
  • Blog clippings
  • Blog reviews
  • Book reviews
  • Case studies
  • Data science
  • Deming
  • Events
  • History
  • Information Technology
  • Laws of nature
  • Management
  • Metrics
  • News
  • Organization structure
  • Personal communications
  • Policies
  • Polls
  • Press clippings
  • Quality
  • Technology
  • Tools
  • Training
  • Uncategorized
  • Van of Nerds
  • Web scrapings

Social links

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

My tags

5S Automation Autonomation Cellular manufacturing Continuous improvement data science Deming ERP Ford Government Health care industrial engineering Industry 4.0 Information technology IT jidoka Kaizen Kanban Lean Lean assembly Lean Health Care Lean implementation Lean Logistics Lean management Lean manufacturing Logistics Management Manufacturing Manufacturing engineering Metrics Mistake-Proofing Poka-Yoke Quality Six Sigma SMED SPC Standard Work Strategy Supply Chain Management Takt time Toyota Toyota Production System TPS Training VSM

↑

© Michel Baudin's Blog 2025
Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes
%d