Michel Baudin's Blog
Ideas from manufacturing operations
  • Home
  • Home
  • About the author
  • Ask a question
  • Consulting
  • Courses
  • Leanix™ games
  • Sponsors
  • Meetup group

Jan 11 2012

Alexey Bushuyev: «Any change is driven by human energy»

Via Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

In November 2011 VI Russian Forum “Production Systems Development” took place; the first national competition aimed at measuring the real business efficiency – the Gastev Cup – was awarded. The main lessons learned: personal commitment of the companies’ executives to continuous change and freeing up employees’ creative potential are key success factors.

Alexey Bushuyev, Deputy Governor of Yaroslavl region shared his impressions of the Forum in his interview for LEAN TV…
Via www.leanforum.ru

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Blog clippings 0 • Tags: Lean, Lean manufacturing

Jan 10 2012

Bringing Lean Management to New York State | WNYmedia.net

Via Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

Note that SAGE in this context is the “Spending And Government Efficiency” commission, a clever acronym, but easily confused with the name of a software company. The absence of a reference to effectiveness implies that the New York state government is already getting the right things done. Also, the idea that Lean capabilities can be developed by “conducting training sessions for agency managers” strikes me as dubious, but this may be the journalist’s interpretation.
Via wnymedia.net

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Press clippings 0 • Tags: Lean, Management

Jan 7 2012

Why people don’t learn Lean Management — Question from Nicolas Stampf on LinkedIn

You might as well ask why people keep behaving in self-destructive ways when they know better, for example overeating and not exercising. The rewards of changing behavior are obvious and they know it, yet they don’t do it until a significant event happens. Getting seriously ill will do it, but so will running for president.
In your question, you also treat the adoption of Lean as an personal choice. It’s not. Organizations choose to implement Lean, not individuals. It is a decision made by top managers, and they must communicate to all levels why they are doing it and that they are dead serious, which means that participation in the effort is a condition for continued membership in the organization.
Also, as Tom Berghan said “Lean isn’t Feng Shui on the business, it is the business.” In other words, if you want to be successful in implementing Lean, you cannot cherry-pick elements of it. Your question is centered on continuous improvement, performance management, and problem-solving, which won’t make much of a difference if they are all you do. In Manufacturing, the core of Lean includes specific approaches to production line design, operator job design, production control and logistics, quality assurance, maintenance, human resource management, accounting, strategy deployment, etc. I understand your work in Banking, where many of these approaches are not directly relevant, which means that you have to invent their equivalent for banking operations.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Management 1 • Tags: Lean, Lean implementation, Management

Jan 3 2012

Omissions on the ASQ’s History-of-Quality web page

Going backwards in time, the ASQ website’ page on the history of quality ignores Lean Quality in the late 20th century, interchangeable parts technology in the 19th, and the origin of the concept of “quality” in ancient Rome.

Specifically:

  1. The page contains no mention of Lean Quality. Lean manufacturers have outperformed competitors by techniques that are not even listed, such as one-piece flow, successive inspection, mistake-proofing, and others. Shigeo Shingo, who created and documented many of these techniques is not referenced. That the  methods are not statistical does not make them less valuable.
  2. The summary ignores the entire 19th century, which saw the emergence of  interchangeable parts technology, with the blueprints, critical dimensions and tolerances that are the foundation of modern quality.
  3. Quality is a word whose origin is known, as it was coined by Cicero in his Academica in 45 BC. What he meant by it is less clear, but my take on it is that it is the way in which a system is more than the collection of its parts.

The first omission is critical because Lean Quality is the state of the art in quality management. The second is mind boggling: how could a history of quality skip over a massive, decade-long and eventually successful undertaking that was targeting the elimination of variability? The third is a detail.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • History 1 • Tags: Lean, Quality

A3 sample

Jan 2 2012

What is an A3?

Many discussions of A3 reports in Lean omit one basic fact: A3 is a paper format. In millimeters, a A3 sheet is 297X420, roughly equivalent to 11×17 in inches. It is the size of two A4 sheets side-by-side, and half of an A2 sheet. The A-series of  paper sizes is used all over the world, except in the US…

An A3 report is not just a story on one sheet of paper, but on one sheet of paper of this particular size, which has been found right to tell a manufacturing story with just enough details without turning into a victorian novel.

It can be posted on bulletin boards or above operator workstations. Operator instruction sheets are actually supposed to be on A3 paper.

Size does matter. If you shrink an A3 to A4 or letter size, it is no longer works as an A3, because the print will be too small for viewing on a board. If you show it on a PowerPoint slide, it is not an A3 either, because it does not have the permanence of hardcopy and, unless you have really advanced IT, you cannot annotate it manually.

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Management 36 • Tags: Lean, Lean manufacturing, Management

Dec 27 2011

IndustryWeek survey on Continuous Improvement

Via Scoop.it – Cellular manufacturing
According to this article, the survey shows that continuous improvement separates the winners from the losers and drives financial gains.  The body of the article, however, contains no information about the survey method. We know neither how many companies responded nor the positions of the people who responded. I assume that survey questionnaires were sent to a selected group of executives, and that some among the recipients opted to answer. I am not sure what such a sample is supposed to represent.

The article says that more respondents with continuous improvement programs expect revenue and income growth >3% in 2012 than respondents without such programs. So it is about what this self-selected sample believes will happen next year. The only statement about actual results is a similar one about cash flow for this year. Based on the article, I fail to see how the survey supports the claims in the title and subtitle.
Via www.industryweek.com

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Press clippings 0 • Tags: Continuous improvement, Management

«‹ 151 152 153 154›»

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 575 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • Deviating Standard Deviations
  • The Language of Money for Engineers and Managers
  • Three San Francisco Bay Area Writers Have Coffee
  • Gemini Deep Research About Michel Baudin
  • The Lowdown on the Range Chart

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Answers to reader questions
  • Asenta selection
  • Automation
  • Blog clippings
  • Blog reviews
  • Book reviews
  • Case studies
  • Data science
  • Deming
  • Events
  • History
  • Information Technology
  • Laws of nature
  • Management
  • Metrics
  • News
  • Organization structure
  • Personal communications
  • Policies
  • Polls
  • Press clippings
  • Quality
  • Technology
  • Tools
  • Training
  • Uncategorized
  • Van of Nerds
  • Web scrapings

Social links

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

My tags

5S Automation Autonomation Cellular manufacturing Continuous improvement data science Deming ERP Ford Government Health care industrial engineering Industry 4.0 Information technology IT jidoka Kaizen Kanban Lean Lean assembly Lean Health Care Lean implementation Lean Logistics Lean management Lean manufacturing Logistics Management Manufacturing Manufacturing engineering Metrics Mistake-Proofing Poka-Yoke Quality Six Sigma SMED SPC Standard Work Strategy Supply Chain Management Takt time Toyota Toyota Production System TPS Training VSM

↑

© Michel Baudin's Blog 2026
Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes
%d