Michel Baudin's Blog
Ideas from manufacturing operations
  • Home
  • Home
  • About the author
  • Ask a question
  • Consulting
  • Courses
  • Leanix™ games
  • Sponsors
  • Meetup group
Press Detroit Rivera

Oct 15 2012

Lean in a press shop

Andrew Turner, Managing Director at Ramsay Engineering, in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa posted the following question on The Lean Edge on 9/22/2012:

“Our company is split in 2 sections, the one a JIT assembly plant, the other a mass production Press Shop. Implementation of Lean in the JIT plant has been relatively simple (not that Lean is ever really simple), however, we are struggling with the implementation in our Press Shop. I know the importance of items like SMED and Heijunka in driving this journey, yet we are battling to get the ball rolling forward. Where do you think we should start the process in the Press Shop?”

To date, he has received responses from the following authors:

  1. Art Byrne: First link the logical value streams through product families, then get change over times under 10 mins
  2. Mike Rother: Depends on Your Goals
  3. Peter Handlinger: Establish a daily pattern production schedule to sequence your presses
  4. Tracey Richardson: Start with Production Control and Empower People through Standards

Of these, Art Byrne’s is the most specific and actionable. None of them, however, address the issue of skills development. At the outset, neither the press operators nor their managers can be expected to have a working knowledge of Lean or how to implement it. Therefore, feasibility by the organization you have is key in your initial choice of projects.

This is why, in shops where people work with machines, the first pilot projects are so often about SMED. This includes not only press shops but machine shops, injection molding shops and diecasting shops, with different technical specifics. On press operations, see Chapter 7 of Sekine & Arai’s Kaizen for Quick Changeover. Keeping in mind the skills development goal, you don’t start with your largest machine that currently takes 8 hours to set up, but with a small one that takes 30 minutes and that you can take down to 4 minutes in 2 months. This kind of success fires up your teams to take on tougher challenges.

After a successful pilot, when you want to apply SMED as appropriate in the entire shop, you need to analyze your activity to establish where it is most useful and easily achievable, and you need to realize the engineering implications. You usually cannot achieve SMED on presses with organization and standard work only; you also need to modify the machines, standardize the dies, and improve the flow of dies to and from the machines, including die maintenance, storage and retrieval. You have to know what and how long it takes to do it. This is not the sort of goals you reach with a few Kaizen events.

Peter Handlinger is the only responder to mention the issues of high- versus low-volume items, but only in the context of setting up daily schedules. I prefer to refer to this as demand analysis, and do it upfront, far upstream from production scheduling, with the objective of breaking down the output of your press shop into the following:

  • Runners, to each of which you dedicate on or more press or press lines.
  • Repeaters,  that you group in families by feature similarity to make in flexible press lines.
  • Strangers, that are items with low and sporadic demand that you make in small job-shop inside your press shop.

You use this breakdown to drive changes in the layout of your shop. In particular, it tells you which presses or press lines you can integrate with an assembly line, as Art Byrne recommends. Then you apply different approaches to production control for the different types of lines.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Technology 0 • Tags: Lean, Lean implementation, Lean manufacturing, Manufacturing engineering, Press shop

Oct 14 2012

Manufacturing bouncing back as US, Colorado companies reshore jobs – Denver Post

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

“In years past, if you bought an iPhone case from Fort Collins-based OtterBox, the nation’s leading cellphone casemaker, it was a given that the product, like the gadget it protects, wasn’t made in the U.S.A.

That’s starting to change.

‘We’ve been able to reshore about 15 to 20 percent of our volume back to the U.S. from China over the last year,” said Bill Lovell, OtterBox’s global director of supply chain…'”

This is an “I told you so” moment. For years, we were telling US manufacturers that it made business sense to improve their existing operations, only to hear executives say “We’ll skip Lean and go straight to China.”

In emerging economies, low wages are temporary, and they come with low productivity and quality, long lead times across oceans, and high logistics costs. As the work force learns manufacturing, wages rise along with performance, and the cost advantages vanish.

Admitting there are cases where chasing low wages around the world makes economic sense, in most, if you invest in an emerging economy, you do better by betting on its future, and developing relationships that pay off more and more as it grows, for example by building local factories to serve the local market, as the top car companies have done in China.
See on www.denverpost.com

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Press clippings 0 • Tags: Manufacturing, Reshoring

Oct 11 2012

To journalists: if you write about Lean, check your facts!

An otherwise informative newspaper story about a company’s Lean approach in a local newspaper contains the following paragraph:

“The heart of lean is kaizen, a Japanese term. ‘Kai’ means to take apart, and ‘zen’ a striving toward perfection. Kaizen is a process in which a team of employees is brought together to focus on a problem that needs solving or a process that needs improving. Improvement is continual, and that’s the striving for perfection. Edward Deming, a statistician from the U.S., brought the idea to Japan after WW II when he struggled to get American manufacturers to listen to his ideas. Lean and kaizen principles were widely adopted by Japanese manufacturers and helped Japan rebuild after the war.”

This is a remarkable paragraph. Other than saying that Kaizen is Japanese, every statement in it is inaccurate. Let us review them one by one:

  1. “The heart of lean is kaizen,..” Well, not really. It’s only part of it. You can’t implement Lean with just Kaizen, and you can practice Kaizen without being Lean.
  2. “‘Kai’ means to take apart,…” Not in my copy of Nelson’s Japanese dictionary! ‘Kai’ means change, renew, mend, not “take apart.”
  3. “…and ‘zen’ a striving toward perfection.” In the same dictionary, Zen means good, goodness, right, virtue, not “striving” for anything, let alone “perfection.”
  4. “Kaizen is a process in which a team of employees is brought together to focus on a problem…” What about Kaizens done by individuals through a suggestion system?
  5. “Edward Deming, a statistician from the U.S., brought the idea to Japan after WW II…” It’s W. Edwards Deming, and what he brought to Japan was not Kaizen but statistical quality control.
  6. “Lean and kaizen principles were widely adopted by Japanese manufacturers and helped Japan rebuild after the war.” Assumes Lean and Kaizen existed before Japan’s post-war reconstruction.

The rest of the article is actually interesting, informative, and credible about the specifics of the case. It didn’t need a paragraph of background. If, as a journalist, you write about a case of Lean implementation, don’t write such a paragraph without checking  the facts.

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Press clippings 2 • Tags: Deming, Kaizen, Lean

Oct 10 2012

7 Charts About America’s Manufacturing Industry

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

Seven Charts from the US Census Bureau That Show How Essential Manufacturing Remains To America. These charts do not include other useful numbers from the US Census Bureau, such as value-added per industry, with value-added defined as Sales – External Inputs, where the external inputs are comprised of materials, energy, and outsourced services.

See on www.businessinsider.com

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Press clippings 2 • Tags: Economic statistics, Manufacturing

Oct 7 2012

Ahead to the Past: Dependence on mass inspection in iPhone 5 assembly

See on Scoop.it – lean manufacturing

“…a government spokesman for the Zhengzhou industrial zone said about 100 Foxconn inspectors refused to go back to work after one was reputedly beaten by disgruntled workers.’The instruction to strengthen quality inspections for the iPhone 5 was given by Apple Inc. following multiple complaints from customers regarding aesthetic flaws in the phone,’ said the unnamed spokesman…”

30 years after Deming called on manufacturers to cease dependence on inspection to achieve quality, the practice seems thriving in the assembly of an iconic 12st-century product. It should be noted that the quality issues are not about how the iPhone 5 works but how it looks. They are purely issues of assembly and handling, not electronics.

See on appleinsider.com

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

By Michel Baudin • Press clippings 0 • Tags: Apple, Inspection, iPhone 5, Quality

«‹ 118 119 120 121›»

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 578 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • My Toyota Forklift
  • Label your charts!
  • Quality and Me (Part I) — Semiconductors
  • Update on Data Science versus Statistics
  • How One-Piece Flow Improves Quality

Categories

  • Announcements
  • Answers to reader questions
  • Asenta selection
  • Automation
  • Blog clippings
  • Blog reviews
  • Book reviews
  • Case studies
  • Data science
  • Deming
  • Events
  • History
  • Information Technology
  • Laws of nature
  • Management
  • Metrics
  • News
  • Organization structure
  • Personal communications
  • Policies
  • Polls
  • Press clippings
  • Quality
  • Technology
  • Tools
  • Training
  • Uncategorized
  • Van of Nerds
  • Web scrapings

Social links

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn

My tags

5S Automation Autonomation Cellular manufacturing Continuous improvement data science Deming ERP Ford Government Health care industrial engineering Industry 4.0 Information technology IT jidoka Kaizen Kanban Lean Lean assembly Lean Health Care Lean implementation Lean Logistics Lean management Lean manufacturing Logistics Management Manufacturing Manufacturing engineering Metrics Mistake-Proofing Poka-Yoke Quality Six Sigma SMED SPC Standard Work Strategy Supply Chain Management Takt time Toyota Toyota Production System TPS Training VSM

↑

© Michel Baudin's Blog 2025
Powered by WordPress • Themify WordPress Themes
%d