May 16 2012
Two news stories highlight conflicting interpretations of Kaizen
Dateline 3/16/2012, Marion, Ill: Aisin recognized with top achiever award. This article recounts how “Aisin Manufacturing Illinois of Marion was recently recognized for their success among all Aisin operations in North America, as the top achiever in the 1-person/1-kaizen program. The 1-person/1-kaizen program is a national program that allows Aisin team members the opportunity to submit and implement ideas for improvement in the areas of safety, quality, cost, delivery or environmental.” In other words, it is an individual suggestion system.
Dateline 3/19/2012, Anoka County, MN: County taking Lean approach to government. The approach to improve the processing of paternity cases was designed by outside consultants, Innovation Process Design, LLC. Their were implemented “using the Kaizen process.” Since recommendations from outside consultants couldn’t possibly be implemented by individual employee suggestions, “Kaizen” obviously does not have the same meaning as in the Aisin story. Drilling through from the article, you reach a government website from the EPA, which defines Kaizens as “rapid improvement processes,” organized in the form of events.
That Kaizen should mean something so radically different in the Japan and the US would not be a problem if the success of the original, Japanese Kaizen were not used to promote the made-in-the-USA Kaizen events. One particularly unfortunate consequence is the quasi-total absence of Kaizen activity in the original senses in US factories that are not Japanese transplants.
Don Fitchett
May 18, 2012 @ 6:00 am
Comment in the IndustryWeek manufacturing network on LinkedIn:
Michel Baudin
May 18, 2012 @ 6:02 am
Kaizen in Japan actually has a broader meaning than in the article about Aisin, where it refers only to individual suggestions. Kaizen is also often implemented through small-group activities that I personally find more effective because they can address slightly larger issues than individual suggestions and participants develop project management and teamwork skills.
Regarding the Anoka county story, I only checked out the EPA website to verify in what sense the word “Kaizen” was used in the article. My concern was not about errors in government documents. More generally, if you say “Kaizen” in an US plant, it is understood to mean “Kaizen Events” and nothing else. For an exception to this rule, see the article I ran into about Aeron chairs.
Greg Hjelmeland
May 18, 2012 @ 5:59 pm
Comment in the SME Society of Manufacturing Engineers discussion group on LinkedIn:
Daniel Stoelb
May 18, 2012 @ 9:46 pm
Comment in the Leadership and Lean The Top 5% discussion group on LinkedIn:
Todd McCann
May 25, 2012 @ 5:38 am
Comment in the Leadership and Lean The Top 5% discussion group on LinkedIn:
patricia e moody
May 30, 2012 @ 8:17 am
This is pretty shocking but should we not be surprised nearly 4 decades later? A Mill Girl at Blue Heron Journal
Kaizen in Japan versus the English-Speaking World | Michel Baudin's Blog
November 30, 2013 @ 3:30 pm
[…] Two news stories highlight conflicting interpretations of Kaizen […]