Mar 20 2016
Sales, Marketing, and Manufacturing Improvement
The following reader question popped up in another blog:
“Does Lean apply to sales? We’re trying to introduce Lean thinking throughout the company and have found very little on how to lean the sales department.”
The response was a set of tactical recommendations on the behavior of sales reps with customers. Strategically, however, you need to think about the role of Sales within the business. It is not just to provide a flow of orders every day. Marketing is often mentioned in the same breath as Sales, with good reason, because sales are the business’s best source of market intelligence. Contrast, for example, the following approaches:
- Selling through dealers. Selling through dealers protects you against market fluctuations but also cuts off direct contact with the end-users of your products. This may delaying you noticing changes in demand volume or customer tastes. This is one reason why Apple opened its own stores. In another industry, as recounted by David Simchi Levi, Italian pasta maker Barilla introduced a form of vendor-managed inventory with dealers to get a better handle on the popularity of different products.
- Door-to-door sales, as Toyota did in Japan into the 1980s, provided direct access to the market. But it was too expensive and was abandoned. In 2000, Toyota established the Gazoo business division that operates the gazoo.com internet portal for Toyota customers, providing used car prices, maintenance tips, shipping for devices to keep kids entertained during long rides, and road trip recommendations. To my knowledge, no other car company has done anything similar. According to Alexa, Gazoo ranks 799th among all web sites in Japan. Toyota does not explain the motivation to start Gazoo, but it is not difficult to guess that it strengthens the bond between the company and the car owners, while their clicks provide the kind of first-hand market information the company used to get from door-to-door sales.
- eCommerce. Online sales also establish a direct link between end-user and supplier, providing information that is easier to get than to interpret, and not as rich as an in-person, direct human interaction. Also, when selling through an online retailer rather than directly, the information is shared with that retailer, which may be better equipped to exploit it than the manufacturer.
As manufacturing performance improves, so does the business’s ability to respond to the market in at least the following ways:
- With timely market information and short manufacturing lead times, the business is both better able to dial aggregate production volume up and down, and to adjust the product mix. The months-long lag you often observe between changes in demand and in production cause companies to pile up finished goods during industry downturns and miss out on sales during booms. Reducing this lag to one week directly translates to more cash available to weather downturns and more income during booms.
- Sales often receives requests for small runs of new products for test marketing. A responsive manufacturing organization is also able to promptly produce them, and then ramp up to high volume when the tests are successful. This alone can drive explosive growth.
Sid Joynson
March 20, 2016 @ 2:09 pm
To ask if lean/TPS can be applied to a specific activity is like asking if improving an athlete’s fitness will increase their performance.–
What we need a holistic view of the weapon we have to use on the global business battlefield. It has two edges; one is manufacturing the other is sales and marketing. The body of the blade, which provides the mass behind the edges, is forged from our people’s abilities. The handle through which we wield this awesome weapon is made from the skills of the management team. Lean and TOC are sections of the manufacturing blade edge. The sales and marketing blade also has its own individual sections. Both blade edges must be kept sharp. —
I find too many people think one small section of the blade is the weapon. We must teach our companies to understand the complete weapon and how to use it. . Too many of our leaders are qualified in the ‘Management of Battle Administration’, but don’t know how engage all their people to fight and win the war..
I think the sword analogy describes the holistic nature of the business warrior’s task.
Michel Baudin
March 21, 2016 @ 7:00 am
The more you broaden the range of applicability, the more you have to filter any technique, approach, or tool that is specific to one type of activity. At the end, all you are left with is not much more than “Be good!”
Every business has sales, some also have marketing, and some also have manufacturing. A manufacturing business revolves around factories. That’s why we call it a manufacturing business. Everything else is about selling the products the factories can make today, developing new ones for the future, building new factories, retooling or closing old factories, developing the factory work force, maintaining facilities and equipment, etc.
Their focus on making things makes factories a special kind of organization, with technical and human dynamics that I don’t believe you find in car rental, retail, health care, or public service.
Concepts from manufacturing may have crossover value in other industries, but I would not claim it always does. I think the relevance to TPS to an industry has to be established case by case,
Patrick Ross
March 21, 2016 @ 3:23 am
My definition of Lean is “Making the Right decision, at the Right time, at the Closest point to where value is Added and/or Created in the Process”.
This definition allows those typically biased to believe that “lean is only about Manufacturing” to broaden their horizons..or at least consider that it could, maybe, apply to their process.
However, the biggest barrier I encountered is that Sales people, and, (some) R & D people tend to think that they do not have processes. Sales, to many of them is a combination of a creative and mysterious activities, with a few transactions…
To get their attention, it is necessary to map the sales activities, even maintaining the perception of a few of the “mysterious” steps. When visualised as a process, with inputs, outputs, deliverables, performance criteria, etc the realisation that maybe such a process could actually be improved, by making decisions closer to where the value is added/created, finally starts to dawn… But it takes time and effort!
Philip Marris
March 25, 2016 @ 6:16 am
Comment in the TPS Principles and Practice discussion group on LinkedIn:
Aleksandar Stamenkovic
March 25, 2016 @ 6:22 am
Comment in the Lean Six Sigma Worldwide discussion group on LinkedIn:
Mark DeLuzio
March 25, 2016 @ 6:27 am
Comment in the Lean Six Sigma discussion group on LinkedIn:
Ives De Saeger
March 27, 2016 @ 6:10 am
Comment in the Lean Six Sigma discussion group on LinkedIn:
James Potter
March 25, 2016 @ 6:31 am
Comment in the Continuous Improvement, Six Sigma, & Lean Group discussion group on LinkedIn:
Frederick Stimson-Harriman
March 27, 2016 @ 5:55 am
Comment in the TPS Principles and Practice discussion group on LinkedIn:
Philip Marris
March 27, 2016 @ 6:00 am
Comment in the TPS Principles and Practice discussion group on LinkedIn:
Osamu Higo
March 27, 2016 @ 6:17 am
Comment in the Continuous Improvement, Six Sigma, & Lean Group discussion group on LinkedIn:
Gary Stewart
March 27, 2016 @ 5:46 pm
Comment in the TPS Principles and Practice discussion group on LinkedIn:
Toyota’s Way Changed the World’s Factories. Now the Retool | K. Buckland & N. Sano | Bloomberg | Michel Baudin's Blog
February 18, 2018 @ 8:47 am
[…] Sales, Marketing, and Manufacturing Improvement (2016) […]