Nov 23 2013
Kaizen in Japan versus the English-Speaking World
In a discussion of the economic justification of Kaizen in the TPS + 1 ENGINEERING discussion group on LinkedIn, Kenyon Denning asked what Kaizen is and is not, and pointed to the English dictionary definitions on the web. Why look up a Japanese technical term in a general-purpose English dictionary? We should focus instead on what Kaizen means as a technical term in Japan.
If we are using it to mean something else, we are misleading our audiences, because they assume that you are talking about the approach that has contributed to the success of companies like Toyota, Honda, Matsushita, Kawasaki, and others, and that is the only reason they are listening. And the problem is that we are indeed using the term differently. The most common usage is in “Kaizen Events,” a project management format developed in the US that does not actually implement Kaizen. The popularity of Kaizen Events crowds out the genuine Kaizen from practically all the Lean implementation programs in the US. To see it in the US, your best bet is to visit Japanese transplant auto factories.
Over the past 35 years, Kaizen has become an English word. Among other data, Google about gives you the following chart of the use of Kaizen in English over time. This chart based on a search of Google Books by ngram viewer. After rising steadily from 1978 to 2000, it has been holding steady through 2008, the latest point provided, at 0.33 words/million.
By comparison, for the same year, the following table gives Google’s occurrence rates for a few selected terms. I assume Google compares single words with other single words but I am not sure what it does with a 2-gram like “Lean manufacturing” that is used in speech like a single word.
The available on-line definitions for Kaizen in English dictionaries are as follows:
- Random House (2013):
- A business philosophy or system that is based on making positive changes on a regular basis, as to improve productivity.
- An approach to one’s personal or social life that focuses on continuous improvement.
- Origin: < Japanese: literally, ‘continuous improvement’
- Collins Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition (2009):
- A philosophy of continuous improvement of working practices that underlies total quality management and just-in-time business techniques
- Dictionary.com’s 21st Century Lexicon:
- Japanese for continuous and incremental improvement, a business philosophy about working practices and efficiency; improvement in productivity or performance.
- Etymology: Japanese ‘change for the better’
By contrast, following are a few Japanese views on the subject:
- The most common general language dictionary used in Japan is the Kojien (広辞苑). Its definition of Kaizen (改善) is “the act of making a bad place good again” (悪いところを改めてよくすること) and the example given is “improving the treatment” (待遇を改善する). The opposite is “changing for the worse” (改悪, Kaiaku).
- In a technical context, author Bunji Tozawa defines Kaizen as “changes in methods to make the work easier, conceived and implemented by those who do the work.”
- Another Japanese author to emphasize Kaizen is Masaaki Imai, who defines it as “ongoing improvement involving everybody, without spending much money.”
- In 1985, the Japanese Factory Management monthly (工場管理) issued a Dictionary of Shop Floor Kaizen (現場を改善する辞典), which managed not to contain a definition for “Kaizen,” but, like Tozawa and Imai, it emphasized that kaizen is something everybody does, to make the work easier to do, produce better quality output faster and cheaper, while making the workplace safer. The list covers every known dimension of manufacturing performance except morale, which improves as by-product.
To Tozawa, each discrete change is a Kaizen; to Imai, Kaizen is the process by which these improvements are made on a continuing basis. I have not seen an explicit emphasis in Tozawa’s writings about Kaizens being cheap, but it is implicit in the idea that the improvements are done by the people who do the work. Cheap, however, does not mean free, and Kaizen activities commonly involve giving individuals or teams license to spend a few hundred dollars at a hardware store for a project, but a $50K investment would be outside the scope of Kaizen.
None of the English dictionaries says anything about changes being made in work methods, by the people who do the work, and requiring little or no investment. In none of the Japanese descriptions of Kaizen does it rise to the level of a “business philosophy.” The nature of Kaizen is best shown through examples, and I would like to share one that struck me as a particularly vivid illustration.
About 15 years ago, Kojo Kanri focused an issue on Kaizen in the kind of dirty jobs that do not receive much management attention (泥臭い改善, dorokusai kaizen). There was in particular a story about a circle of high-speed train janitors who were tired of cleaning the same toilets 8 times a day. These trains were equipped with traditional, Japanese squat toilets that international passengers did not know how to use and messed up as a result.
One obvious solution was to replace these toilets with the worldwide standard. It would have been no hardship for the Japanese passengers, because this style is already used in 90% of homes and work places in Japan. But replacing these toilets in 100 16-carriage trains could not have been done quickly, and was an investment beyond the scope of Kaizen.
So the janitors took a number of simpler steps, and measured the results in terms of the number of required cleanings per toilet per day. This included posting some graphic explanations on how to use the equipment, painting outlines of where users should place their feet, and finally materializing the right locations with rubber pads to make it awkward to place your feet anywhere else. At the end of the project, the required cleanings were down to one toilet per day.
Earlier posts on Kaizen in this blog include the following:
- What is Karakuri Kaizen?
- Value-Stream Mapping, Kaizen Blitzes, and Jishuken
- Kaizen and small things – A recent example
- Kaizen and small things
- Two news stories highlight conflicting interpretations of Kaizen
- Kaizen events versus Continuous Improvement
- Factory life with and without Kaizen
Sid Joynson
November 24, 2013 @ 11:05 pm
Comment in the TPS Principles and Practice discussion group on LinkedIn:
Michel Baudin
November 24, 2013 @ 11:08 pm
Yes, etymology is often not helpful, but, between the parsing of Kanji and induced behaviors and attitudes, there is also what an activity consists of. And Kaizen has some specific boundaries. It is not all encompassing. In the US, the so-called “Kaizen event” is widely believed to be a panacea.
Honda widely practices Kaizen, mostly through its New-Honda Circles, but it is far from being all they used to achieve dominance in motorcycles. There is also, for example, the “racing spirit.” Soichiro Honda early on decided to get the company involved in racing and gave it the goal of winning all the major races in the world. At a time when the company’s main business was retrofitting US military engines on bicycles, his employees thought he was nuts.
He explained that he wanted to instill the racing spirit into all of the company’s activities and, to this day, it permeates its project management practices, from product development to new product introduction. And it is really different from Kaizen.
Jerry O'Dwyer
November 25, 2013 @ 5:46 am
Comment in the TPS Principles and Practice discussion group on LinkedIn:
Michel Baudin
November 25, 2013 @ 5:58 am
Thanks for pointing out Unipart. One of the links at the bottom of the post is about genuine Kaizen work in an American plant from a non-Japanese company.
There are good examples, but not the mass adoption of the concept that the on-line chatter would lead you to expect.
Richard H. Sears
November 25, 2013 @ 7:37 am
Wow, all of you are commended for the research and persistence involved in trying to get to the “root” of the Kaizen definition but can’t it be made somewhat simpler and not risk losing an audience by defining in with “Kai means to change, fix, make new, improved attitude while zen means the ideal state, correct, the natural way of things, good, or make better which loosely and simply translated means continuous improvement.
Steve Milner
November 25, 2013 @ 10:23 am
Comment in the TPS Principles and Practice discussion group on LinkedIn:
Bob Miller
November 26, 2013 @ 6:20 am
Interesting. So what are the important threads
1. continuous improvement of the processes in order to simplify work and/or improve outputs 2. created by the people who do the work 3. with limited investment or significant ROI?
Michel Baudin
November 26, 2013 @ 6:43 am
The following is what I posted on the TPS +1 Engineering group on LinkedIn on the question of economic justification of Kaizen:
I would add to it that economic justification and ROI are not synonymous. ROI is a specific ratio, linked to the payback period. If your payback period is five years, your ROI is 20%. For economic justification, you usually look at least at two metrics:
Sid Joynson
November 27, 2013 @ 6:18 am
Comment in the TPS Principles and Practice discussion group on LinkedIn:
Victor Garcia Zapien
November 27, 2013 @ 6:37 am
Comment in the Lean & Kaizen discussion group on LinkedIn:
John Crum
November 27, 2013 @ 6:42 am
Comment in the Lean & Kaizen discussion group on LinkedIn:
Chen Chengguang
November 27, 2013 @ 6:44 am
Comment in the Lean & Kaizen discussion group on LinkedIn:
Michel Baudin
November 27, 2013 @ 6:47 am
There is what Kaizen is there is and what you need to do for Kaizen to be practiced on a shop floor, in a plant, or in a company. These are two different questions, and you need the answer to the first one before you ask the second one. I do not believe that what is keeping so many American companies from implementing Kaizen is culture or lack of commitment. Instead, it is that the managers have never been told what it actually is.
I don’t think it is helpful to bring up Japan versus “the West,” whatever that might be. Differences in national cultures are only ever used as an excuse to not doing, never as a reason to do. They are always disablers, never enablers. An improvement is an improvement, and it does matter whether it is in Nagoya, Chennai, Chicago, or Moscow.
Sid joynson
November 28, 2013 @ 1:23 pm
The ultimate Kaizen- continuous improvement activities (Japanese, English. etc) must be focused on ourselves and our ability to contribute to the welfare of our family, friends, business associates and our society. Our society should be seen as local, national and global..
We are on a journey to develop successful businesses; but our journey is also about the development of our humanity.
I find the following story helps me understand the humanity part of our journey.
A good person died and went to heaven. When they met the lord they complained about and suffering in the world and asked their God why he didn’t do something about it;
God replied “I did – I sent you”.
RAUL IVAN CERREÑO CARO
November 29, 2013 @ 7:16 am
Comment in the Lean Six Sigma Worldwide discussion group on LinkedIn:
Michel Baudin
November 29, 2013 @ 7:25 am
My concern is not nailing down the exact meaning of Kaizen. Instead, it is that we are missing out on a valuable approach because its name has been mistranslated and the mistranslation has been crowding out the accurate one, on which there is a broad consensus in Japan.
Think of it as what Disney has done to the classics or other cultures, from the Hunchback of Notre Dame to Arabian Nights. They take outlines of the original stories and bowdlerize them beyond recognition, according the marketing formulas. All Disney heroes are orphans, so Aladdin is an orphan, except that, in Arabian Nights, he is the son of a tailor. It would be fine if the Disney version didn’t crowd out the originals worldwide.
As the experience of Japanese transplant factories in the US shows, the original version of Kaizen works just fine with American workers. There is no cultural block, and the local companies that are not doing it are missing out.
How is it in Peru? Is Disney’s “The Emperor’s New Groove” an accurate rendering of Inca culture? Which version of Kaizen do you practice?
Michel Baudin
November 30, 2013 @ 12:43 pm
The national culture argument reappeared in the Continuous Improvement, Six Sigma, & Lean discussion group on LInkedIn, where Marcelo Correa wrote:
And Alberto Perbellini chimed in with:
In fact, genuine Kaizen in the US has been practiced with success in Japanese transplant companies and their suppliers, through suggestions systems and small group activity.
When small group activity was tried in American companies in the form of Quality Circles in the early 1980s, it worked. I saw it personally in the semiconductor industry. Quality Circles were abandoned in the US after a few years, because managers had started them with the unreasonable expectation that it was all they needed to do to make their manufacturing practices competitive.
When they realized their mistake, they threw out the baby with the bath water. Elsewhare, small group activity still thrives, not only in Japan and Japanese transplants in the US, but also at least throughout Southeast Asia. See Jon Miller’s article about this in Quality Digest.
A factory is a factory is a factory, all over the world. The relevant social context is that of the factory, not the country. The work of manufacturing breeds a special subculture that is different from that of other businesses and strong enough to trump national culture. The national culture arguments are excuses
David Hutchins
December 2, 2013 @ 7:20 am
Comment in the Continuous Improvement, Six Sigma, & Lean discussion group on LinkedIn:
Dave Trent
December 2, 2013 @ 9:09 am
What a fantastic series of comments! This is why I continue being a student of Lean. Great minds out there and I am proud to be (remotely) associated with you all.
Implementation of Lean in an industrial construction world brings unique challenges, not the least of which is the command/control culture. It is difficult to overcome the egos in our business and one must continuously remain aware that these egos must be “managed” by implementers. Change is slow, but change is happening!
As to Kaizen, our industry is very much aligned with the western definition. Many cases of outside expertise being brought on board to identify and resolve under- producing aspects come to mind. All of which (I am happy to say) involve the workers at the work face, but none of which (I am sad to report) involve the cultural shift necessary to truly achieve long-term continuous improvement. We are seeing improvement with individual opportunities, but very little improvement in the mindset of our leaders.
Letting go and trusting the workers is still on the distant horizon. I’m guessing that those in manfufacturing (having limited/little success) are also suffering in similar ways.
We will continue to fight the good fight with what I like to call “Patient Tenacity”, with the long term goal of seeing true cultural change.
Mike Clayton
December 9, 2013 @ 9:11 am
Comment in the Lean Six Sigma Worldwide discussion group on LinkedIn:
Michel Baudin
December 9, 2013 @ 9:23 am
Small group activity, patterned after Quality Circles, is not in the form of intense spurts. Typically, a circle is a team of 5 to 8 volunteers for one year, during which they work on a succession of projects, each of which lasts about four months. The circle meets at least once a week but preferably twice, in overtime. In addition, the members may come once or twice for each project on week-ends to advance implementation.
Joe Indovina
December 10, 2013 @ 5:59 am
Comment in the Lean Six Sigma Worldwide discussion group on LinkedIn:
Steven Borris
December 10, 2013 @ 6:03 am
Comment in the Lean Six Sigma Worldwide discussion group on LinkedIn:
Michel Baudin
December 10, 2013 @ 6:13 am
I am not arguing against the “Kaizen Blitz.” In fact, I think that, where appropriate, it is an excellent tool. My issue that it is misleading to call it Kaizen, and that, by doing so, we are crowding out the real thing.
In companies in the US that are using Kaizen events, or blitzes, management believes they are practicing Kaizen. If, however, they visit good Japanese plants, they run into people who have never heard of “Kaizen Events,” and to whom Kaizen is something different.
Steven Borris
December 11, 2013 @ 5:44 am
Comment in the Lean Six Sigma Worldwide discussion group on LinkedIn:
Michel Baudin
December 11, 2013 @ 5:49 am
The dominant form of activity in US Lean programs is the “Kaizen event” which isn’t Kaizen at all.
In Japan, Kaizen implementation is done through Do-its, suggestion systems, and small group activity. To me, small group activity is what is most missing in the US. Toyota itself has not been emphasizing it lately, but NUMMI had about 100 problem-solving circles active at any time, for a work force on the order of 5,000. I don’t know if they have them at Georgetown or San Antonio. Honda has “NH circles.”
Many American companies had short-lived “Qualiy circles” in the early 1980s.
Glen Knight
December 11, 2013 @ 5:46 am
Comment in the Lean Six Sigma Worldwide discussion group on LinkedIn:
Michel Baudin
December 11, 2013 @ 6:17 am
I agree both on the specifics of your comments on Ishikawa’s book and on your general statement that organizational culture trumps national culture. I was particular struck by this fact when consulting in plants from a multinational company located in the US, the UK, Italy, and the Netherlands.
Besides ideas on how to make things, organize businesses, and work together, Japan has given the world outstanding art, literature, architecture, movies,…, and people who can be the most faithful friends. That is the bright side and what makes it a fascinating country. Unfortunately, as you point out, there is a dark side, and not just in Ishikawa’s thinking. I experienced it while living in Japan and it is the reason I did not stay.
This being said, you also see comments in these discussion groups that are equally prejudiced, to the effect that there is nothing new in TPS and that it is just stuff that was taught by Americans after World War II, denying the existence of any innovation in Japan in nearly 70 years since.
We just need to look past this, evaluate ideas on their own merits, and judge people as individuals, on the content of their character.
Shivaram K
December 11, 2013 @ 6:26 am
Comments in the Lean Six Sigma Worldwide discussion group on LinkedIn:
Steven Borris
December 11, 2013 @ 6:28 am
Comments in the Lean Six Sigma Worldwide discussion group on LinkedIn:
When to Use “Kaizen Events” to Achieve and Sustain Results | Michel Baudin's Blog
January 30, 2015 @ 6:08 am
[…] Kaizen in Japan versus the English-Speaking World (11/23/2013) […]
Japanese Rest Stops Won’t Keep You Waiting | Motoko Rich | New York Times [Clipping] | Michel Baudin's Blog
October 11, 2016 @ 2:24 pm
[…] years ago, in a post on Kaizen in Japan Versus The Rest Of The World, I concluded with a discussion of “Kaizen that stinks” ((泥臭い改善, dorokusai […]