How to Do a Gemba Walk | Michael Bremer | Slideshare


“A ‘how to’ outline for executives trying to do an effective Gemba Walk”


Michel Baudin‘s comments:

No disagreement with what Michael Bremer is saying, but I would emphasize observation skills more.

One exercise Kei Abe came up with is the bug hunt. You take a team of managers to the floor and give each one 20 red tags. They they have 20 minutes to attach the tags to such “bugs” as frayed cables, devices held with duct tape, puddles of lubricant, misplaced items, etc. They usually have no trouble using all 20 tags.

I also ask people to be like the Count in Sesame Street and count people walking, machines not working, etc. These activities have a data collection and validation value in their own right, but they also focus the eyes of participants and make them notice details they would otherwise miss.

See on Scoop.itlean manufacturing

He who doesn’t hear, sees nothing | Bodo Wiegand’s Watch

Bodo Wiegand heads the Lean Management Institute, which is the German affiliate of the Lean Enterprise Institute. The following is a translation from German of  the June, 2013 issue of his newsletter,  Wiegand’s Watch:

When I was 12, my grandfather used to take me along on his “rounds,” as he called it.

We then had a foundry, where he did his “rounds” every day. Following my grandfather’s instructions to stay together, we walked hand in hand through the foundry operation itself, through mold and sand preparation, through the basement, etc. It took 1 ½ hours. Whenever something was wrong, he called Mr. Meier, Schmitz, or Schulte and asked “Why are there so many boxes?”, “Why is  the cigarette  there?” “Why is the aisle blocked?” “Why is the machine stopped?” “Why do we have a problem when casting?”  When employees ran around without glasses or helmets, there was real trouble.

But even when something that should have been finished was not,  or the clock was wrong, he intervened. At that time, I thought it capricious. Now I know how important personal protection gear is, and how important clocks and punctuality are.

His motto has always been: “If the clocks are wrong, no one can expect the people to be on time when you need them.With him there was absolutely no excuse for being late – but no one came late.

Back to the tour. He spoke with each supervisor, but only about problems – business but also human. Sometimes he stayed by a machine and listened. Then he called the head of maintenance, who usually said: “Yes, I’ve heard. We’ll take a look this week-end.”  I was always deeply impressed and tried to listen . Yet I could hear nothing. I could hear any difference until my grandfather told me what I should hear and the difference  with a machine that was working fine. Then I “heard” for the first and only time.

When became production manager in the forge, I remembered these tours and tried to think back to the individual details to hear and see. It took me a while before I could do this successfully.

The greatest praise I received in that position was from our maintenance manager, Mr. Hensing. When I called his attention to a noise that struck me as funny, he said: “It’s been a long time since anybody noticed.”

Well, why am I writing this? I have the feeling that we have forgotten how to hear and see, and to walk properly through the shop floor. I have a feeling that our supervisors and young managers have not learned to see, let alone hear or correctly make their rounds through operations, which implies seeing things and responding appropriately.

If I pass a cigarette butt on the ground or walk past a box with something in it that should not be there, then, as the saying goes: “What the boss tolerates or does not criticize is allowed”.

But if I want to change the mindset in my business and I am not an example, for example by tolerating waste, then I cannot expect employees to recognize and eliminate waste in their daily hard work. Therefore, I will not let this topic rest, and, to help, will make a virtual “Waste Walks” a centerpiece at the German Lean Summit of 24 to 26 October in Berlin to illustrate this topic from different angles.

Bodo Wiegand

What to look for on a gemba walk

Gemba (現場) means actual place. As consultants, we ask clients to show us their gemba, and we exhort their managers to do it routinely. But we must have a clear idea of why we should go to the gemba and what to do once we are in it. In Manufacturing, the gemba is the production shop floor.

For a consultant, the point of walking through a factory shop floor is to learn about its current state, complete through direct observation what could not be known through previously received written or oral input, and to validate or refute this input. For a manager, making daily rounds through the shop floor is different, and involves two-way communication. The manager’s presence, body language, and attire are by themselves a message to the work force. Being watched by everybody, the manager can listen and ask questions, but must be cautious not to give instructions to operators over the heads of supervisors.

From documents received ahead of time or personal communication, the consultant might know that the plant is using dispatch lists from an ERP system to schedule production. On the shop floor, these dispatch lists and the way they are used would be visible. Manual annotations could reveal that the tasks are not done in the recommended sequence, and a supervisor could explain that this is due to setups or missing parts. In other words, you don’t go to the shop floor to find out what the intended scheduling system is, but to find out how work is actually sequenced and what relationship it has with the scheduling system output. A manager walking with the consultant would make a note of the situation, and follow up on it later with supervisors and Production Control.

Shop floor observations include the overall design of the plant for production and internal logistics, as well as details that reveal how it is operated. You can tell whether it is a job-shop, a flow line, or a collection of flow lines. You can tell whether the flow of materials is visible, what kind of equipment is used for materials handling, and how much of the floor is used for warehousing versus production. When you zoom in on individual stations, you can assess the level of automation and the attention that has been paid to the design of operator jobs. You can also check out the accuracy of the signage, the presence and use of andons, mistake-proofing devices, production monitors, and team performance  boards.

It is quite possible to walk through the aisles and not notice that the plant is anything but a tight ship. The key to actually seeing is to not just watch but instead act. This activity yields information both directly and indirectly. Several tools are available to help you see better, some of which require more than a quick visit. They include the following:

  1. Using a Seven Wastes Checklist. The list of seven wastes helps you identify occurrences of them, whether you keep in on a paper checklist or in your mind.
  2. Following the flow. Pretending you are a work piece and following the process backwards from the end to the beginning,  noting where and how many times it waits for transportation or processing, how operators perceive upstream and downstream colleagues, the tools,  fixtures and storage devices  used at each operation.
  3. Counting. You emulate Sesame Street’s “The Count”  and start counting people, machines, parts or fixtures. That’s how you may notice that 20% of the people are walking in the aisles rather than tending to their machines. You ask a few questions and find out that half of those 20% are going to or returning from the tool crib. You have not only discovered that the plant uses a wasteful method for distributing tools, but you also have a ballpark estimate of the productivity improvements at stake in setting up tool pickup and delivery milk runs. Thus the simple act of counting people has led you to discover a pattern of wasteful operation, which you will then recognize immediately elsewhere. In other words, you have learned to see it.
  4. Hunting for bugs. Kei Abe came up with the “bug hunt” as a means of making managers aware of common small problems that are easily overlooked. 10 to 20 managers get each a stack of 10 red tags and 20 minutes to attach them to frayed cables, broken gauges or switches, puddles of oil, lubricant on the floor, devices held in place by duct tape, or any other detail that is clearly wrong. Wherever I have seen this method used, all managers used up their stack of tags, and came away stunned by the sheer number of small maintenance problems they found.
  5. Conducting video time studies. These directly generates process time data, and indirectly causes you to notice details of the work that you would otherwise miss. For example, you see that an operator is much busier than a neighbor, or lit from behind behind and working in his or her own shadow, etc.

Other perspectives on this topic include the following:

  • Eugene R. Goodson, in the May, 2002 issue of the Harvard Business Review, published an paper entitled Read a Plant — Fast proposing a method for a small team to rate a plant in 11 categories–including safety, scheduling, inventory, teamwork, and supply chain. I find the recommendations useful but insufficient, particularly in the areas of layout and work station design. I also don’t believe in assigning scores on subjective scales, with categories ranging from “poor” to “best-in-class.”
  • Joseph Paris has a blog post called The Gemba Beyond the Window, with some interesting insights on communicating the monetary value of what you have on the shop floor.
  • The AME’s Accelerating the Journey blog contains the following list of  “10 Questions asked on a Gemba Walk”:
  1. What are the business issues with this product?
  2. Who is responsible for the value stream for this product?
  3. How are orders from the customer received?
  4. Where is the pacemaker process, triggered by customer orders?
  5. How capable, available, adequate, and waste-free are assembly activities?
  6. How capable, available, adequate, and waste-free are the fabrication activities feeding assembly?
  7. How are orders transmitted up the value stream from the pacemaker process?
  8. How are materials supplied to the assembly and fabrication processes?
  9. How are materials obtained from upstream suppliers?
  10. How are employees trained in Lean procedures motivated to apply them?

I find these questions puzzling, for the following reasons:

  1. You don’t need to be on the shop floor to find the answers to questions 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 and 10.
  2. Questions 5 and  6, that are really about the shop floor, are leading. Asked in this form, they suggest that assembly and fabrication are indeed waste-free. What you are really after is finding out where the waste is, and where the processes lack capability or capacity.
  3. Question 4 implies that production is scheduled by heijunka on a pacemaker process and pull on other processes. The more general question is of how production is scheduled in the plant. As discussed above, only part of this answer is found on the shop floor.
  4. Question 10 implies that there should be a Lean training program. I don’t understand why training should be the only aspect of the company’s Lean program to rate a question. Before coming to the floor, I would ask whether the plant has such a program. On the shop floor, you should see its effects.